PA Supreme Court rules in favor of victims' families, AG must have oversight when DA overturns cases

The ruling was a victory for the family members of a man murdered in 2004. Lavar Brown was found guilty of the murder of Michael Richardson in 2004, and he was found guilty of the murder of Robert Crawford in 2005.

Published: June 18, 2026 7:32am

A ruling by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court on Tuesday will give oversight to the state's Office of Attorney General when Philadelphia District Attorney Larry Krasner seeks to overturn cases. 

The ruling was a victory for the family members of a man murdered in 2004. Lavar Brown was found guilty of the murder of Michael Richardson in 2004, and he was found guilty of the murder of Robert Crawford in 2005. 

Brown sought relief under Pennsylvania's Post Conviction Relief Act (PCRA). While his first attempt was denied, Krasner's office granted Brown a new trial on his second attempt. 

The family members of the victims asked the state Supreme Court to intervene and review Krasner's order. Tuesday's ruling reverses that order, WPVI reported

"The Court held that the DAO's concession was not reliable, as it had failed to disclose material evidence, submitted a false stipulation, misrepresented facts, and opposed a required evidentiary hearing," Pennsylvania Attorney General Dave Sunday said in a statement. 

The court also ruled that the attorney general's office will have oversight when the Philadelphia district attorney's office tries to overturn a conviction, saying that the office had made "unreliable concessions unsupported by the facts and law." 

 

 

 

The Facts Inside Our Reporter's Notebook

Unlock unlimited access

  • No Ads Within Stories
  • No Autoplay Videos
  • VIP access to exclusive Just the News newsmaker events hosted by John Solomon and his team.
  • Support the investigative reporting and honest news presentation you've come to enjoy from Just the News.
  • Just the News Spotlight

    Support Just the News